Thursday, October 30, 2014

Response to “Making Meaning Clear: The Logic of Revision” by Donald M. Murray



     What strikes me most about this essay is this statement: “The teacher must give the responsibility for the text to the writer…”(34) in that it, for me, perfectly sums up how teachers, with the best of intentions, can sometimes hinder a basic writer’s progress. When students turn in a first draft, many teachers immediately mark errors related to lower order concerns (LOC). The student then revises the document; however, the teacher has interfered with the revision process by giving students information about where the students should focus his/her efforts—on LOCs. The student typically trusts that the teacher is giving them the correct information and focuses his/her revision process on spelling, punctuation and grammar.  While students need to understand and use these conventions to be truly proficient, these errors are --by far -- less important than organization, clear focus and development of the narrative so that the audience can access the writer’s purpose. The students’ revision process, disrupted in this way, may lead them to simply correct the errors marked by the teacher and, after learning nothing, consider their work done. This focus, by the teacher on LOCs, basically subverts the process and potential of writing. It inhibits the growth of critical thinking skills, the ability to reflect on writing and the discipline to tough it out through what can be a very difficult process. Teachers—and again, I’m including myself—need to allow students to do their own work in a way that benefits them in the long run. We need to relinquish control of the process and trust that our students will improve without excessive intervention regarding low order concerns.

No comments:

Post a Comment